Annotated Bibliography

Darling-Hammond, Linda (1998) Unequal Opportunity: Race and Education

The Brookings Institution
http://www.brookings.edu/articles/1998/spring_education_darling-hammond.aspx

There is a presumption now that equal opportunity exists in schools among all races. This view attributes low achievement levels on standardized tests as a function of genes, culture and a lack of effort on the part of minority students. This view does not take in to account the fact that the U.S. educational system is one of the most unequal in the industrialized world. The reality is that these educational outcomes are much more a function of their unequal access to necessary educational resources, including skilled teachers and quality curriculum. In order to make assumptions based on culture and effort the students must be operating on a level playing field. This is clearly not the case in our country. Recent analysis of data has shown that in many states on every tangible measure, from qualified teachers to curriculum offering, that schools dominated by students of color had considerably less resources that schools dominated by white students. These are the same areas that fare the worst in educational expenditures. It is very easy to see these test scores and just blame it on lack of effort. In order to make these scores relevant at all we need to look into ways to make educational opportunities more fair. When given the same educational resources studies have shown that students of color achieve at the same level as white students. Some states have already taken a step in the right direction. They have equalized educational spending, enforced higher teaching standards, and reduced teacher shortages. The most important thing in education is that every student deserves and opportunity at a good education. Until this happens we cannot blame the students for the gap in test scores.



Ravitch, Diane (2007) Get Congress Out of the Classroom

The Brookings Institution

http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2007/1003education_ravitch.aspx

This article talks about the negative effect that No Child Left Behind has had on our classrooms. This has created an unhealthy obsession of standardized testing and has diminished time in the classroom for teaching other important subjects. Another important issue is the choice to move to another school if your school is not meeting the standards. This seems great except that it is not that easy in the inner cities. Most schools in the inner city do not have seats available to accommodate other students. This makes it very unequal, especially in the areas that need the most help.

Berliner, David (2008) Why Rising Test Scores May Not Equal Increased Student Learning

Harvard Ed Review

http://www.hepg.org/news/23

A big problem with standardized testing is the idea that test scores must go up or else. This forces the schools to teach toward the test. They hold test prep classes and teach exactly what is on the test. This will result in rising scores but it may not result in a higher level of learning. The students can spend up to 60 days a year preparing for these tests. But this is not education, this is training. So the result is student being very well prepared for one specific test but this does not mean that they are prepared for life after the test.

Miller, Virginia (2001) The New Definition of Standards in American Education

The Heritage Foundation

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/BG1427.cfm

In order to improve quality of education, policy makers at the federal, state and local levels are pressing for higher standards in education. So far they have only implemented standards and have paid little attention to their content. The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS) has been trying to identify the skills need in the workplace and how we can implement these in our curriculums. This is an effort to have our education in the classroom better prepare our students for the workplace.

Geier, Robert; Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.; Marx, Ronald W.; Krajcik, Joseph S.; Fishman, Barry; Soloway, Elliot; Clay-Chambers, Juanita (2008) Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform

Educational Resources Information center

http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?_nfpb=true&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=standardized+test&searchtype=keyword&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b8035620b&accno=EJ813446&_nfls=false

This article takes a look at a different way of teaching called inquiry based teaching. It took a group of 7th and 8th graders from Detroit and used inquiry based teaching in their science curriculum. Then they compared their test results to all the other 7th and 8th graders in the same school. Their findings showed that the experimental group of students out performed the other students on the standardized science tests. Although a small sample size it shows that teaching for understanding can actually help standardized test scores. This is very different from the usual teaching toward the test method.